There’s no shortage of good ideas. The significance of a technology is not really in the idea; it’s in the execution. A mere idea will not change the world. Good leadership, good communication and faultless and execution will. I’m interested in big ideas: the bigger the better. The conquest of the South Pole, the circumnavigation of the North Pole, the genesis of neural networks, the Theranos and WeWork scams, the world domination of the ubiquitous toy LEGO. I’ve enjoyed biographies of Roald Amundsen, who won the race to the South Pole by stratagem, and of Ernest Shackleton, another polar explorer who didn’t achieve the big trophy firsts but paved the way for his successors by proving that they were possible. I loved the biography of Angela Merkel, whose worldview was shaped by her life behind the Iron Curtain in East Germany, and am still absorbing the painstaking work of Vaclav Smil, whose “How The World Really Works” is a fantastic precis of the technology that underpins modern existence like Atlas shouldering the globe. I’ve also included (a) scattered reviews of Persian films, which seldom follow a neat plot, and occasionally neglect plot altogether for mood, notions, or ideas and (b) some original essays. Enjoy!
Related Posts
The Millionaire and the Bard by Andrea Mays
The net result of this book was to instill in me a desire to visit the Folger Library in Washington DC. Henry Folger was Rockefeller’s right-hand man at Standard Oil; Rockefeller as the richest man in the world and one of the richest humans who has ever lived. Folger had the money and power to indulge himself, and his chief indulgence was a burgeoning obsession with Shakespeare. After Shakespeare died, a group of his friends and fellow actors collected his work into a “First Folio” of plays. It’s unlikely that Shakespeare’s plays would persist to this day had it not…
Flying Blind: The 737 Max Tragedy and the Fall of Boeing
One can seethe with rage reading this book.
Bad Pharma by Ben Goldacre
We’re all doomed, was my internal head-shaking reaction, when I read this very unsettling book. Ben Goldacre is a British physician with a wicked sense of humour. In Bad Pharma he takes aim at the unholy and uneasy alliance of pharma companies, regulatory bodies, journal editors and even physicians who conspire to sell drugs to patients. If the drugs are efficacious and safe, so much the better. If not: we have a pill for that. Goldacre credibly presents the strategies deployed to pass off good results as bad. The first eye-opening point for me was: why are drugs always compared…